Feature Requests item #1452792, was opened at 2006-03-17 14:16
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684978&aid=1452792&group_id=119783

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: all projects
Group: 1.2
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jonathan Locke (jonathanlocke)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Member grouping and public API readability

Initial Comment:
I think we should sort class members on access
visibility.  If we do this, a user can just scroll
through the public API in the source code and read it
like a book.  I would prefer that the methods in each
access level were sorted alphabetically, but that's not
so important if people want to manually maintain some
other scheme.  What doesn't work for me right now is
that a method like Component.isEnableAllowed() is stuck
way at the bottom of Component where someone scrolling
through the public methods at the top will never find
it.  I'd like us to adopt some kind of automated method
grouping strategy at least for 1.3, but preferrably for
1.2.  It's really quite hard to see the API in the
source code right now.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684978&aid=1452792&group_id=119783


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to