-Igor
On 3/20/06,
Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why do you want to have this exactly?
And what is the problem with versioning related to this?
The problem is that we use this code:
ListItem item = (ListItem)get(Integer.toString (index));
in the ListView.
So ListView expect the ListItem to be under the index name as its child.
So what is exactly youre usecase?
johanOn 3/20/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi,
Is there any good reason why this shouldn't (couldn't) be implemented?
I really don't want to use versioning, but without versioning the
ListView is quite dangerous.
-Matej
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
