None yet. We're thinking about it.
Eelco
Gili wrote:
I saw a lot of discussion of the various problems and possible solutions but none of them was agreed upon because they each had their own problem. All I know is that in my case the dynamically-generated images should be treated as cacheable because they will not change with clicks (i.e. reference count). What is the proposed solution?
Gili
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:03:00 +0100, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
