right. i meant "your component" until we figure this out... ;-)
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Eelco Hillenius wrote: > None yet. We're thinking about it. > > Eelco > > Gili wrote: > > > I saw a lot of discussion of the various problems and possible > >solutions but none of them was agreed upon because they each had their > >own problem. All I know is that in my case the dynamically-generated > >images should be treated as cacheable because they will not change with > >clicks (i.e. reference count). What is the proposed solution? > > > >Gili > > > >On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:03:00 +0100, Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
