Sound good.
Eelco
Gili wrote:
Well, the problem is that XHTML has no concept of:
<tag/>
versus
<tag> </tag>
As far as I can tell, it views them as identical. Wicket is introducing this foreign concept because it wants to make it clear that <tag> can *never* have a body and to hint otherwise is wrong. Fine, I agree.
But maybe we can say: "wicket.markup.MarkupException: A panel declaration must be an empty-tag of the format <tag/>"?
Gili
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
