as far as I remember ... Gili intended to reparse the markup in order
to be able to remove the <table> tag from markup. IMO this not the
write approach to solve that problem. I sent him the source code of a
component which allows to disable to render the component's tags
(start and close). Thus you could make
<div>
<table id="wcket-...">
....
</table>
</div>
and the component attached to table woud either render its tags or not.
IMO there is no need to open up the API for that case. And as Eelco
mentioned, instead using <b> you should use CSS.
Juergen
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:59:15 -0800 (PST), Jonathan Locke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> you should be able to toString() any MarkupElement or non-ComponentTag
> subclass since that's an Object method. this is the only assumption you
> should make and should be sufficient for any purpose you might use a
> non-ComponentTag subclass for. i agree that this detail should be in the
> documentation.
>
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Gili wrote:
>
> > Jon,
> >
> > I was simply saying:
> >
> > Hey, I know I've got a MarkupElement here and it's not of type
> > ComponentTag . . . then you guys come along and say I can assume it is
> > of type RawMarkup (even though I can't check whether that is true) and
> > I'm sitting there wondering "how safe is this assumption really? what
> > happens if new types are added in the future?".
> >
> > If you believe it is *always* safe to make this assumption,
> > feel free to note this in the Javadoc somewhere and explain why that
> > is. For example: "It is safe to assume that any unknown MarkupElement
> > is of type RawMarkup because this means the code will ignore unknown
> > markup tags in the future. We actually want to do this in order to
> > ensure that old code will continue running when the framework is
> > extended to add new types".... Does that make sense? It just isn't
> > explicit really and I feel hesistant to make such an assumption in my
> > code. I'd feel better if it was clarified in the documentation.
> >
> > Gili
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:54:32 -0800 (PST), Jonathan Locke wrote:
> >
> > >cowwoc says:
> > >
> > >"The point is, if ComponentTag is public, RawMarkup should be
> > >too, so we can check which of the two children we get back
> > >from MarkupStream.get()"
> > >
> > >in bug 1092016.
> > >
> > >if you're out there cowwoc, can you explain what it is that you want to do
> > >with a RawMarkup tag if you detect it? we're trying to keep details of
> > >markup rendering out of the hands of users as much as possible. i think
> > >it is more likely that you have a problem you're trying to solve that
> > >would cause us to create a new rendering feature for you. but if you have
> > >a good reason for needing a RawMarkup tag, we might open this up.
> > >
> > >in any case, it ought to be possible to solve your problem. please let us
> > >know WHY you want to check the markup tag type like this. what problem
> > >are you trying to solve?
> > >
> > >thanks,
> > >
> > > jon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >-------------------------------------------------------
> > >The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> > >Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> > >It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Wicket-develop mailing list
> > >[email protected]
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-develop mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-develop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
