Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by "<wicket:link>
should not work on regions but just on a single nested anchor link".
Are we still talking about applying region-level autolink support? Are
you saying you want a <wicket:link> *per* link in the HTML page?!
Sorry if I sound a bit panicy here but this implementation is
beginning to sound unusable to me. All I want to be able to do is
enable autolinking across my entire webapp and not have to think about
it at all. I don't want to have to insert <wicket:link> tags anywhere
at all .. it should just apply it anywhere possible. Can I do that with
the approach being proposed?
Gili
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 01:11:14 -0800, Jonathan Locke wrote:
>
>that all makes perfect sense to me assuming you mean that <wicket:link>
>should not work on regions but just on a single nested anchor link. i
>like the way automatic linking is off so people potentially get to learn
>about it when they turn it on...
>
>Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
>
>>Below are some of the latest contributions to the discussion thread. I
>>thought we agreed on <wicket:link>.
>>
>>Eelco:
>>Ok, ok. You know what? I'll just back off from this discussion, and see
>>where it heads. Maybe, I'll be convinced along the way, but for now: 'me
>>-1 for automatic anchor processing'.
>>
>>Jon:
>>I have an idea to resolve this which might work for everyone. we could
>>introduce <wicket:link> for explicitly declaring autolinks ([] still
>>goes away, thank goodness). then we could make an app setting
>>setAutomaticLinking(boolean) to allow people to turn on the "implicit"
>>behavior. the default would be off and docs would explain aliasing
>>behavior of automaticLinking. it's a compromise, yes. if we can't
>>agree on the availability of this feature, i suppose we should stick
>>with current functionality alone (just <wicket:link>).
>>
>>i think we need to continue to support the ability to include web pages,
>>images and other resources on the classpath because we need to be able
>>to jar up components with their whole resource set. i believe this
>>worked last time i looked...
>>
>>Eelco:
>>+1
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>>_______________________________________________
>>Wicket-develop mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>_______________________________________________
>Wicket-develop mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
