heh. DOH!
it should be concrete. it's the new wicket servlet and has to be instantiable.
i'm surprised the tests worked...
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Sorry, forget it. WicketServlet is abstract
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:20:38 +0100, Juergen Donnerstag
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jon,
am I right that due to the restructuring of WicketServlet and Application we have to change web.xml like
<servlet> <servlet-name>HelloWorldApplication</servlet-name> <servlet-class>wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet</servlet-class> <init-param> <param-name>applicationClassName</param-name> <param-value>wicket.examples.helloworld.HelloWorldApplication</param-value> </init-param> <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup> </servlet>
Juergen
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
