heh. DOH!

it should be concrete. it's the new wicket servlet and has to be instantiable.
i'm surprised the tests worked...


Juergen Donnerstag wrote:

Sorry, forget it. WicketServlet is abstract


On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:20:38 +0100, Juergen Donnerstag
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Jon,

am I right that due to the restructuring of WicketServlet and
Application we have to change web.xml like

   <servlet>
       <servlet-name>HelloWorldApplication</servlet-name>
       <servlet-class>wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet</servlet-class>
       <init-param>
         <param-name>applicationClassName</param-name>
         
<param-value>wicket.examples.helloworld.HelloWorldApplication</param-value>
       </init-param>
       <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
   </servlet>


Juergen





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to