okay. i was just trying to make sure you weren't saying more that wasn't getting across...
Gili wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:40:54 -0800, Jonathan Locke wrote:
i understand what a peer is. but i'm still not entirely clear on what you're talking about... is the "peer" you're talking about a hunk of code implementing an interface?
I mean to say... If Wicket components were interfaces, then Peers would be concrete classes that implement them.
Anyway, I think we're basically clear on the idea I'm trying to convey here. Please disregard the abuse of terminology.
Gili
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
