The majority are not xhtml. There is just too little benefit
for it right now.Gili On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:49:48 +0100, Juergen Donnerstag wrote: >I'm not an expert on web design. How many sites under development (not >existing ones) are not yet xhtml but still html? > >Juergen > > >On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:43:29 +0100, Juergen Donnerstag ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've just tested it. dreamweaver is not complaining (no warning, no >> error) about <span />. nor <div /> on a xhtml compliant document. >> Though it does show an error on html. >> >> Juergen >> > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Wicket-develop mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
