Personally, I found the user manual to be far more useful than
independant FAQ entries. Especially for beginners, there need to be a
feeling of cohesiveness.

Gili

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:11:17 -0800, Jonathan Locke wrote:

>
>given how busy everyone is, i'm starting to wonder if a user's guide 
>isn't a little too ambitious right now.  especially for 1.0.  i just 
>can't imagine it happening because there's too much to do and too few 
>people who can work on it.
>
>what i'm thinking might be good and useful to have for the 1.0 release 
>instead would be more like a bunch of FAQ entries, much better 
>documentation in the examples (i'd like us to get really fussy about 
>these since most people look at the examples before they read the docs!) 
>and a couple tutorials.  and i'd suggest that we just remove the 
>existing user's guide stuff for 1.0 (from the core doc folder) so people 
>don't get confused by it (it's /really/ out of date now).  i think we 
>could do smaller stuff like this for 1.0 in a couple of weeks and do it 
>well if everyone pitched in as much as they could...  i've gone and 
>updated the three "Quick Tour" pages on the web site so they are more 
>like little micro-tutorials.  this seems like a good start to the kind 
>of "spot documentation" we have time for right now.  if non-native 
>english speakers would like me to proof their FAQ entries or tutorials, 
>i'd be happy to pitch in there.
>
>for myself, i'll have bugs to fix and a ton of other stuff to do in the 
>next couple weeks, so i'd like to mainly contribute to documentation by 
>working on javadoc and writing a couple of FAQ entries which answer 
>questions that other people might not know the answers to.  if people 
>have questions they want answered in the FAQ or things they don't 
>understand, one good way to do that is to file a doc bug and suggest the 
>subject there.
>
>btw, on the FAQ page on the website, i was hoping there was some xdoc 
>way of doing FAQs so there's a bunch of "top links" in groups (by 
>category) at the top of the page that link to the actual Question and 
>Answer down the page.  is that possible?
>
>      jon
>
>Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>
>> Jonathan Locke wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> btw, was wondering which documentation project is the official one 
>>> that we're working on.  my assumption is that the wiki is where we're 
>>> building the wicket user's guide.  is that right?
>>
>>
>> What is comforting the most. I was busy working on the wicket-userdocs 
>> project in docbook format. The wiki is less technical for others to 
>> contribute in, so I created that spot for easier collaboration. I 
>> think working in the wiki is the best place. I can easily put the text 
>> created there into the docbook format and release that when finished 
>> as a PDF, 1 page HTML and multipage HTML.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>>
>>>
>>>        jon
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wicket-develop mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wicket-develop mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
>Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>_______________________________________________
>Wicket-develop mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to