thankyou!
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I can do the changes.
Juergen
Comment By: Jonathan Locke (jonathanlocke)
Date: 2005-02-26 10:42
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=486414
This was a good point martijn.
I think Crypt functionality belongs in core because core is dependent on it and cannot function safely without it. Those having trouble with wicket's default functionality should switch to another Crypt implementation (and we should provide several), implement ICrypt or use NoCrypt.
To implement other providers, I think Crypt should be refactored into AbstractCrypt and what is now Crypt should really be a subclass of AbstractCrypt called SunJceCrypt. If we want to add cryptix support we would subclass AbstractCrypt to make CryptixCrypt and then users could simply getSettings().setCryptClass(CryptixCrypt.class).
Make sense?
Let me know if you can make time for this, Juergen.
Thanks!
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
