On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 22:43:27 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote: >I really hope we can come up with something good. Though Gili posted an >interesting view on the subject, I don't think that the 'undo operation' >is the correct view. When I hit the back button it is not *always* >because I want to revert changes, but because I want to choose something >else.
You're saying that if a user commits something to the database, then hits back, enter different data and "submit" again it should add the new data but not undo the original commit? I understand some websites let you do that, but I would argue that the behavior I suggested is the correct and intuitive one. Back means undo to me in all cases I can think of. Can you come up with a clearer use-case where it does not? Thanks, Gili ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
