Speaking about serializable stuff...

With detachable models, why do they also have to be serializable ?

Cameron.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wicket-develop-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johan Compagner
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 March 2005 12:28 AM
> To: Wicket Developer List
> Subject: [Wicket-develop] should we make AbstractResource serializeable or
> not?
> 
> Our clone by serialize did encounter a few serialization exceptions for
> example
> all the Resources (like image). Should we make AbstractResource
> serializeable?
> those can be in the session..
> 
> johan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-develop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to