On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:32:18 -0800, Jonathan Locke wrote:
>if gili wants to go test our new PageState mechanism by making a nice
>subclass of PageState using xstream (XStreamPageState?), that might make
>a really nice contrib or extensions class...
Before I do I want to make sure I have a better understanding
of how far I can go to serialize as little as possible with the web
container and handling the rest with XStream. My main concern is for
user-classes: users should not have to worry about serialization or
no-arg constructors and I simply want to give them the option of doing
so. So it would be nice if say we'd still have to persist Wicket using
the web container but everything else could be handled "in-house" by
Wicket using XStream.
Gili
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
