On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 08:41:45 +0100, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:

>1) It is useful for debugging. 
>2) We try to avoid magic. Some tags get removed automatically, other
>don't?. Of course there are always explanations why it automatically
>gets removed, but we'll have to explain it again and again. Just my 2c
>note, the all or nothing approach is the cleanest and easiest to
>understand.

        You know what? You make a very good point. I guess I had more
problem with the fact that we expand:

<wicket:body/>

        into

<wicket:body/>
[body goes here]

        then:

<wicket:body>
        [body goes here]
</wicket:body>

        It should really be the latter. Then I'd be ok with it.

Gili



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to