Hmm, and while we're on the topic... here is a really odd
point:
Why do we need a wicket prefix in "id" at all? If IDs must be
uniquely identifable across the entire document, we can just refer to
them by their id without any sort of prefix. This would be much
cleaner. No more voodoo magic.
If I missed something please point it out.
Thanks,
Gili
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:21:12 -0500, Gili wrote:
>
> Ok, on the topic of Bug #1123751 (mentioned below) the main
>problem is that when a List is rendered it reuses the same ID for all
>of its entries. First it is important to point out that this issue is
>List-specific and not a Wicket-wide problem. Why not strip the "id"
>attribute from the list entries during the render process and users can
>use AttributeModifier (as suggested in the bug report) to add in unique
>IDs back in if they so wish. At worst, this will be just as good as
>using a "wicket" tag for the list item and at best it could be better
>because it improves standard compliance (we're follow the HTML DTD).
>
>Gili
>
>On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:07:24 -0500, Gili wrote:
>
>>
>> Ok, I found this:
>>http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=6585080&forum_id=
>>42354
>>
>> I'm going to give it some thought.
>>
>>Gili
>>
>>On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:00:18 -0500, Gili wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 07:56:43 +0100, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
>>>
>>>>100% html output compliance. Is that good enough for a reason? please
>>>>review the discussion we had regarding that topic.
>>>
>>> I don't see why you can't just use the id prefix for that...?
>>>
>>>>You still didn't explain why <span wicket="xxx" id="yyy" > breaks
>>>>previewability.
>>>
>>> I was thinking you were refering to using
>>>
>>><span wicket="xxx">
>>>
>>> that is, replacing "id" by "wicket". If you're going to use
>>>both, HTML browsers, validators, tools will flags your code as invalid
>>>(since it fails to meet the HTML DTD) but I think it should still
>>>preview fine because browsers tend to ignore errors silently. Still, my
>>>view is that you can avoid all of this and just use "id" to begin with.
>>>
>>>Gili
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop