If Resource is an IResourceListener shouldn't it be named ResourceListener?
Maurice -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Johan Compagner Verzonden: woensdag 30 maart 2005 13:07 Aan: Wicket Developer List Onderwerp: [Wicket-develop] IResource, Resource, AbstractResource... Very confusing! Hi, I find the resources classes we have here in wicket very confusing.. Because we have a IResource interface. and a AbstractResource class which implement the interface But we also have an abstract class Resource but that isn't a IResource but a IResourceListener. This is a bit confusing naming. I think the Resource class that has a method getResource() (that returns a IResource) is a ResourceLocator So i think that the Resource class should be renamed to ResourceLocator and all subclasses like WebResource and SharedResource should also be called: WebResourceLocator and SharedResourceLocator.. The problem is that we already have a ResourceLocator class... that also returns IResource objects.. So maybe Resource->ResourceHolder? johan ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
