Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Only potential problems I see with it, is that it consumes more memory potentially, though as all processing is done in one pass, it might save a bunch of temporary objects that were used otherwise.
Not necessarily using more memory, but keeping on to the allocated memory for a little longer (until the redirect is processed). The stream is written in memory, so the final HTML document is already fully in memory on the server. We now just keep track of it until the redirect returns.
Martijn ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
