Hi,
This is regarding bug #1251168. I was told this issue was discussed but
I'm not sure when/where. Please excuse me if I discuss anything which
you have already.
I think that we need to define the lifetime scope of resources in
general in order to solve this problem. Specifically, JSP has the
concept of application-scoped session variables versus page-scoped
session variables.
In my application, I'd like to define the screenshot static image to
have application-scope so that even if the page that holds it hasn't
been hit yet, anyone can hit the image directly. On the other hand, I
expect all other images on the Page to get GCed when the Page itself does.
Currently I don't think that we ever GC images resources -- at least I
haven't seen this documented anywhere. What do you guys think of the
application vs page-scope idea? If it works for JSP it should be able to
work for us.
Gili
--
http://www.desktopbeautifier.com/
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
