I think it has more the meaning of a 'package' resource, i.e. something
that resides within your packages. That has nothing to do with /how/ the
distribution takes place.
Martijn
Gili wrote:
I think PackagedResource would be more correct than
PackageResource. Notice the extra D. I mean, you're trying to imply
that the reference points to a packaged (as in JAR, etc?) resource
right? Otherwise please disregard my comment :)
Gili
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
+1
Martijn
SourceForge.net wrote:
Bugs item #1255537, was opened at 2005-08-10 00:08
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item
Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684975&aid=1255537&group_id=119783
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: 1.1
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Jonathan Locke (jonathanlocke)
Assigned to: Jonathan Locke (jonathanlocke)
Summary: Rename StaticResource and StaticResourceReference
Initial Comment:
PackageResource and PackageResourceReference are much
better names for these classes. There has been much
confusion about the intended use of these classes
because StaticResourceReference is NOT
Static(ResourceReference) but rather
(StaticResource)Reference. In fact, a
StaticResourceReference CANNOT be static and must be
created within a request to allow the resource to bind
to the application. The word static was being used
simply to mean that the resource is loaded from a
package (a static (unchanging) resource) and not
dynamically generated. Anyway, a VASTLY better name
for these classes would be PackageResource and
PackageResourceReference, which are fairly
self-explanatory. I would like to rename these for 1.1
to get rid of all the confusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684975&aid=1255537&group_id=119783
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle
Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams *
Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement *
http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle
Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing
& QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement *
http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
