the problem is really about bootstrapping components. i think we've got
it under control.
our approach will be dirt simple.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
I don't want to butt in in the middle of something I don't totally
understand, but here is my two cents anyways:
The problem is that you cannot access an image inside a package without a
resourcereference created?
Getting back to my previous suggestion of tapestry-like services
Tapestry has an asset service that given a package-name of a resouce simply
streams it to the response so you can access any image or any other file by
constructing a simple url:
http://blahblah.com/myapp/app?service=asset&asset=wicket.example.image1.jpg
This eliminates any need for static resource references and since url is
always the same the asset gets cached by the browser.
Am I totally off the field here?
-Igor
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gili
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 3:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Wicket-develop] feedback refactor and paging navigation
it is not a workaround.
Nobody and i really think nobody is going to add all the static
resources the datepicker is needing in there application
including you
This needs to be fixed.
Well, all I know is... because people couldn't hit
screenshots off my website without constructing a Page. This
now works. So I'm happy. It's certainly a step in the right
direction. And no, I don't use the DatePicker :)
Jon suggested using an XML configuration file. I
suggested adding
a method to components (I mistakenly said Page but I meant for all
components) that allows them to return a list of all
resources they
wish to export. etc..
Yes but you still need to know WHAT components what to contribute.
so this must be configured/registered somehow.
i don't want xml either. just a simple property file.
Ok, so I won't suggest the exact details of how to
accomplish this, but let me ask: why don't we declare an
interface which all components must implement which will make
this possible (a la JavaBean) as opposed to using property
files? I'd prefer having this sort of thing as part of the
Class, something I run through a compiler and gets
compile-time validation.
Gili
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development
Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams *
Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement *
http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
