the order is also not guaranteed. and the non-existent ordering
contract is with add()
not validator list. that's implementation that should not be exposed.
Phil Kulak wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I apreaciate the effort that when into
reimplementing java.util.LinkedList, but I've got to ask... why? It
seems to me like it adds about 100 more lines to the code, calls
validate on each validator O(n^2) times where n is the size of the
list, and makes the ordering of the validators undefined (or just in
reverse, I can't really tell from a cursory glance).
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
