Hi, About the naming of the ajax stuff we have now. It's still my first take, and I'm not sure about the names I chose. I think now is just in time to make that last naming changes if we would want that.
We have packages: wicket.markup.html.ajax wicket.markup.html.ajax.dojo wicket.markup.html.ajax.scriptaculous wicket.markup.html.ajax.... I think that's fine, and I'd like to keep that. But then there's: IEventRequestListener (which is completely internal btw) IEventRequestHandler AbstractEventRequestHandler DojoEventRequestHandler ValidationEventRequestHandler etc.. But alternatively, we could have: IAjaxListener IAjaxHandler AbstractAjaxHandler DojoAjaxHandler ValidationAjaxHandler What do you guys like better? Eelco ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
