I don't want to go in a lot of detail, as this isn't a framework discussion list. But if you look at the examples you'll get a good idea.
In short, Rife is/ uses: * page scripting (with an exotic notation); * xml configuration; * weak typed maps to pass context variables to the view; * is not component based (no re-use, state, etc); * etc. Again, I don't want to get into a flame war hear (in case Geert finds this message :)), but it is very different from Wicket. And it's not my cup of tea to be honest. Though the site and logo looks very nice. Eelco On 9/1/05, Geertjan Wielenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Wicketeers, > > Anyone know the connection between Wicket and this: http://www.rifers.org/ > > How do they relate? What are the differences? Seems similar to me. > > -- Gj > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
