Yeah, that sounds like a big improvement. I'm +1 for putting in CVS.
Martijn, did you want the RC out this weekend, or the next?
Eelco
On 9/2/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I managed to remove addToHeader() which was required for markup like
> <wicket:head>
> <span wicket:id="myLink" .../>
> </wicket:head>
>
> with the new implementation you simply use add(new
> MyComponent("myLink")) like everyone is used to. No difference. It
> works with all existing test cases and wicket-examples and hopefully
> solves the issue with weak error checking on mismatching component
> versus markup as well. But, of course, it breaks the API (which is not
> yet officially available since it has been introduced for 1.1) and it
> may have bugs which I didn't forsee. Any opionion on putting it into
> CVS or not?
>
> Juergen
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-develop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
