Tough one. At least 'JR' is consistent with the JasperReports API itself. But it is 'JRPdfResource' against 'JasperReportsPdfResource'. I agree the first one isn't /that/ descriptive, though you can find out enough by looking at the package, and knowing the JasperReports API. The latter is getting pretty long.
Not sure what I prefer. Can I have some votes here? And/ or alternatives? Eelco On 9/21/05, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 21 September 2005 04:18, Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > I got rid of the 'JasperReports' names in favor > > of 'JR' (like the API in JasperResports) > > IMVHO, JR is no good, as it isn't descriptive enough. It could mean so much. > One of the things I like about Wicket at large is that it is using very > descriptive names on methods and classes, even if they get fairly long. > > Is "Jasper" not a lot better?? > > > Cheers > Niclas > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own > Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
