And i though we agree that we wil keep this as clean as possible,
just introduce a new property/tag to remove one line of code is not what i like to do.
On 10/10/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think his point is that he wants an easy/ quick way of telling the
the listview elements themselves should not be rendered.
Eelco
On 10/10/05, Martijn Dashorst < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think he wants to do:
>
> <wicket:dummy id="listview">
> <span wicket:id="name">name</span>
> </wicket:dummy>
>
> add(new ListView("listview") {
> protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
> add(new Label("name"));
>
> }
> }
>
> On 10/10/05, Johan Compagner < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and what should we do with wicket:dummy?
> > You can already use wicket:remove
> > http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Tags
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/10/05, SourceForge.net < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Feature Requests item #1321797, was opened at 2005-10-10 05:13
> > > Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item
> Submitter
> > > You can respond by visiting:
> > >
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684978&aid=1321797&group_id=119783
> > >
> > > Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
> thread,
> > > including the initial issue submission, for this request,
> > > not just the latest update.
> > > Category: core
> > > Group: 1.1
> > > Status: Open
> > > Priority: 5
> > > Submitted By: tyrhant (tyrhant)
> > > Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
> > > Summary: Introduce dummy tag
> > >
> > > Initial Comment:
> > > I want some dummy tag that can be used instead of div or span.
> > >
> > > Currently, my code is like this
> > > <span wicket:id="list">
> > > <span wicket:id="label" /><br />
> > > </span>
> > > and I call setRenderBodyOnly(true) in Java side for "list" component.
> > >
> > > If we have dummy wicket tag, I can write
> > > <wicket:dummy wicket:id="list">
> > > <span wicket:id="label" /><br />
> > > </wicket:dummy>
> > > and just setStripWicketTag(true) does the job, right?
> > > I think this way is better for Java-HTML separation than using
> > > setRenderBodyOnly() method.
> > >
> > > The name "dummy" may be not a nice one.
> > > Please give it some better name.
> > >
> > > That's it.
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > You can respond by visiting:
> > >
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684978&aid=1321797&group_id=119783
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> > > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads,
> discussions,
> > > and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wicket-develop mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
