Double thanks! On 10/16/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Validation_Messages > > -Igor > > > > ________________________________ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Martijn Dashorst > Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 9:40 AM > > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Wicket-develop] Use case: Form validation without messages > > > Igor, > > Could you write a wiki page on that? > > Martijn > > > On 10/16/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > But you can provide the proper label for the formcomponents. Thats what > sparked the entire implementation. You can call > FormComponent.setLabel(IModel) and pass in a model that contains the label, > or have a property key with the path of the form component, ie > person.name=Name. Then just use ${label} is required instead of ${name} is > required. > > > > -Igor > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Martijn Dashorst > > Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 6:20 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Wicket-develop] Use case: Form validation without messages > > > > > > > > On 10/16/05, Ralf Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Interesting approach. I don't think we'll support this out of the > > > > box, as it is very basic, and your approach is very easy to implement > by other > > > > users. > > > hmm, I think the approach of having no messages by default could be > > > more suitable, because the default messages will (if I get it right) > > > show the internal id which could be not very helpful to the user > > > (because the label before the form component could be entirely > > > different). > > > > > > I see what you mean. The 'label' should be i10n or i18n (I can't keep them > apart) -ized > > as well. No point in a Chinese application showing 'person.name' next to > some chinese > > traditional characters. > > > > > > > > If you don't mind, I've created a wiki page with your description > > > > for your usecase. > > > No problem at all with that; although I'm not sure if my code is > > > written well-enough for general usage (I was very solution focused > > > when writing this) - I'm especially unsure about adding the > > > AttributeModifier in the onBeginRequest method of the form... > > > > > > When someone has a better idea (or you yourself) the wiki can be altered. > That's why it is a wiki! > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > >
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
