On 10/26/05, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a few thoughts. > Binary authorization is not always good enough. It would not be too hard > to come up with an example that uses authorization to decide if a text > field should be editable or not.
In the end it is allways a yes or no. No matter what model you put on top of it (R/W/Inherit), the net effect will allways be to either do or permit something or not. > Also about the executed I agree that most of the time a component you > don't allow to be executed is not displayed, but what if we do allow it > to be displayed but don't want it to execute. For example a button is > displayed disabled or an image map who only allows a few of the possible > area's to be accessible for the current user. > Yeah. Good point. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
