The idea was that it in the future it will support component render (without previous full render) and that we won't need to change the API than.
Juergen On 1/14/06, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > can we come up with a better name for this method? it looks to me like > it should be called something more like "rerender". > > i'm not so worried about Page.doRender() because that is not a public > API method... but Component.doRender() is part of the public api because > of ajax and so it should have a name that intuitively says what it does. > > jon > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
