Actually you could because you need the components parent, its id and
class, but not the component itself.

Juergen

On 1/15/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not perfect, I agree. It does not work in the constructor. But
> it does work once added to the parent.
>
> Juergen
>
> On 1/15/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > but you dont have the path in the constructor because you dont have the
> > parent. so while this would work for components that retrieve their own
> > markup (pages,panels,borders) it wont work for any regular components that
> > depend on their parent's markup.
> >
> >
> > -Igor
> >
> >
> > On 1/15/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ahh. I think that could still work. Getting the markup associated with
> > > the component class and retrieving the start tag should be possible.
> > > It is independent from where you call it. You only need the component
> > > class and the component path.
> > >
> > > Juergen
> > >
> > > On 1/15/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > i was reffering to Johan wanting to get to attributes from the
> > component's
> > > > constructor, not about the component render before page render.
> > > >
> > > > -Igor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to