just realised my compromise wont work because i dont think there is a
way to tell the difference between a default constructor that is
implemented and the one provided by java.
what we are doing right now is the opposite. we always try the
pageparams constructor, and if there isnt one then we always resort to
calling the default. which is kind of strange anyways because if you
have parameters but no constructor the params get ignored silently.
which is ok i guess.
-Igor
- Re: [Wicket-develop] pagefactory and constructor proble... Igor Vaynberg
- Re: [Wicket-develop] pagefactory and constructor p... Martijn Dashorst
- Re: [Wicket-develop] pagefactory and construct... Igor Vaynberg
- Re: [Wicket-develop] pagefactory and const... Juergen Donnerstag
- Re: [Wicket-develop] pagefactory and c... Igor Vaynberg
- Re: [Wicket-develop] pagefactory ... Juergen Donnerstag
