On 1/26/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah but the syntax inside it is just plain nasty with the attr name and the
> equals.

I agree

>
> what if we do something like this:
>
> wicket:attr="message:key"
> and this leads to attr="valueofkey" in markup?
>

than we have <wicket:message> and wicket:attr which is the same but is not

>
> and as far as checking every attribute is that a problem? its only done when
> the markup is loaded.
>

no it is not. But I very much like the idea that we touch tags and
attribute only if in the wicket namespace. Plain, easy and very clear
for everyone.

Because we didn't find an approach for attrs, we removed it again. And
actually nobody complained and nobody is asking for it. Obviously the
use case is not very compelling. Actually wicket:message is
experimental only for now and it is not activated by default (as far
as I know)

Juergen

>
> -Igor
>
>
> On 1/25/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > not sure. Than you have to evaluate any attributes value. The other
> > approach clearly identifies the wicket attribute which I'd prefer
> > (wicket namespace).
> >
> > Juergen
> >
> > On 1/26/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ah yes. that can be nice for <img alt and <a title attrs
> > >
> > > but all i would do is
> > >
> > > <img alt="wicket:message:key"> if we want to support that at all
> > >
> > > -Igor
> > >
> > >
> > >  On 1/25/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > it is disabled because it tests something that we later removed again.
> > > > Support for the wicket:message="attr=myKeyNotExist"
> > > attribute.
> > > >
> > > > Juergen
> > > >
> > > > On 1/25/06, Juergen Donnerstag < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I don't remember why.
> > > > >
> > > > > Juergen
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/25/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > just noticed test for SimplePage_7 is disabled in SimplePageTest.
> is
> > > there a
> > > > > > reason?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Igor
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
> > > files
> > > > for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> > > > searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD
> SPLUNK!
> > > >
> > >
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wicket-develop mailing list
> > > > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > >
> > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
> files
> > for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> > searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> >
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-develop mailing list
> > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> >
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to