All,
Now we have the following release structure in the file releases on sourceforge:
These are sourceforge packages
wicket
wicket-examples
wicket-extensions
wicket-spring
wicket-auth
wicket-SNAPSHOTS
Each project has its own package, and I collapsed all example projects into the example package
This structure is quite cumbersome to create releases in, as I need to visit all packages seperately to create a release and assign uploaded files to each.
I would like to restructure this, as I quite enjoyed delivering the snapshots where all distributables come into one package.
The proposed structure would look like the following:
wicket-1.0
wicket-1.1
wicket-1.2
wicket-1.3
wicket-2.0
Each 'major' release would get updates in the form of release packages. As all projects are dependent on one another I figured having extensions, spring, auth and examples in one release package would be pretty straight forward.
So now we have:
Package wicket
wicket-1.0
wicket-1.0.1
wicket-1.0.2
wicket-1.0.3
wicket-1.1
wicket-1.1.1
wicket-1.2-beta2
Package wicket-extensions
wicket-extensions-1.0
wicket-extensions-1.0.1
wicket-extensions-1.0.2
wicket-extensions-1.0.3
wicket-extensions-1.1
wicket-extensions-1.1.1
wicket-extensions-1.2-beta2
etc.
I want to transform this into:
Package wicket-1.0
wicket-1.0
wicket-1.0.1
wicket-1.0.2
wicket-1.0.3
wicket-extensions-1.0
wicket-extensions-1.0.1
wicket-extensions-1.0.2
wicket-extensions-1.0.3
Package wicket-1.1
wicket-1.1
wicket-1.1.1
wicket-extensions-1.1
wicket-extensions-1.1.1
Package wicket-1.2
wicket-1.2-beta2
wicket-extensions-1.2-beta2
etc.
This will mean restructuring the file release structure, but I think it is worth it.
Any comments on the proposed structure?
Martijn
--
Cast your final vote for Wicket in the
SourceForge.net 2006 Community Choice Awards!
http://www.wilsonresearch.com/2006/ostgawards06/ostgawards4.php
- [Wicket-develop] Proposal for release change Martijn Dashorst
- Re: [Wicket-develop] Proposal for release change Ingram Chen
