On 4/11/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > May I suggest we delay this request for the next release? No need to quickly > adjust this /now/ and add another couple of weeks of testing to our already > overdue 1.2 release? > > Apparently the pro's are: probably stateless application possible (no > guarantee yet?) > > But the cons are: > - api break > - apparently not a trivial change, more design decisions to be made > - not tested yet > - it's a feature, not a bug
Ok, that was predictable :). So for now, everybody has wait for the next major release and until then have live with the fact that Wicket cannot operate without sessions unless a custom session store is used. I opened an issue (bug as I do think it's a fix for a faulty API and not just an enhancement) here: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1468853&group_id=119783&atid=684975 Eelco ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
