We (on ##wicet, Frank coded an example) just did that, and that seems to work fine.
Eelco On 7/5/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if you add css or javascript to the head of the page at runtime in a dynamic > way > is it then seen in the browser?? > We should first test that. > > johan > > > > On 7/5/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > There's a known problem with head contribution of components, that are > > not rendered when the whole page is (are hidden or not even part of > > hierarchy), but are additionally rendered using an AJAX call. > > > > The problem is, that while the body of the component is placed in the > > page, the head contribution is ignored. > > > > Any ideas on how should we address this issue? > > > > First I though that catching css links and javascript references from > > renderHead would be enough. > > > > But each component with associated markup can have it's own > > <wicket:head>, and this is something we also have take into account. > > > > So what I'm thinking of now is to let component render it's head to a > > buffer - it will probably be a xml snippet with structure like: > > > > <link rel="stylesheet" href="..."/> > > <style type="text/css"> > > ... > > </style> > > <script type="text/javascript" src="..."> > > <script type="text/javascript"> > > ... > > </script> > > > > If this snippet is well formed, I think we can send it as a part of our > > ajax response. > > e.g. > > > > <?xml version=" 1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > <ajax-response> > > <component id="c1" > > > <![CDATA[<span id="c1">3</span>]]> > > </component> > > <head> > > <link rel="stylesheet" href="..."/> > > <style type="text/css"> > > ... > > </style> > > <script type="text/javascript" src="..."> > > <script type="text/javascript"> > > ... > > </script> > > </head> > > </ajax-response> > > > > > > The DOM structure of the head part should be quite straightforward to > > parse. The javascript used to add stylesheet and javascript to html head > > does not seem difficult either. > > > > Now the problem seems to be deciding, whether to apply the contribution, > > or whether it has already been applied. We don't want to run the same > > javascript twice, etc. > > > > How should this be solved? Any ideas? > > > > -Matej > > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > > Wicket-develop mailing list > > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > > > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
