On 27/07/06, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My only concern is how apache frowns on it's projects' working with > non-Apache licensed libraries.
OK, my personal take on this is that I'm not sure if it's quite that bad - we can't have non-Apache code as part of the project, but we're still able to work with it if needed. > What does this mean for the wicket-stuff or wicket-extensions projects? Wicket-stuff will remain at SF, continuing as is. Wicket-extensions remains as part of the core project and moves to Apache, but doesn't change in any other way. > Will the hibernate or spring extensions become "taboo"? (Yes, there's a secret plan to have you replace all your Hibernate code with IBATIS! :-)) Seriously, no, not at all! /Gwyn ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
