On 8/7/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can't you just check the model in onedit if it's the same as the templatemethod? and then clear it?
Oh, or just use your alternative
I'm no css shark, but I think label is ment to be inline; not block. In a table it's ok, because table-cells are block items. In that case it's just some "display: block" or some. But in case of an inline editable label, you can't really do it. Bottomline is that it's the user who knows the usage of the label.
Just my 2€cents
Frank
> Yes ... from a template method for easy configuration would be fine. I could
Was not such a good idea after all I just found out as - of course -
that is used as the next input.
Can't you just check the model in onedit if it's the same as the templatemethod? and then clear it?
Oh, or just use your alternative
> also think of cases when you would prefer "" (empty string) as default value
> and then, using css, make the label fill the content which it is in, like a
> table cell f.ex.
Can't we make that the default? You know how to do that?
I'm no css shark, but I think label is ment to be inline; not block. In a table it's ok, because table-cells are block items. In that case it's just some "display: block" or some. But in case of an inline editable label, you can't really do it. Bottomline is that it's the user who knows the usage of the label.
Just my 2€cents
Frank
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
