On 8/11/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not in favor of this proposal. A framework should watch out not to > a kitchen sink for everything you can image. You give the example of > page parameters now. But what about constructor arguments in general? > What about the model?
I totally agree about the kitchen sink. However, I think protecting pages that have parameters is not an unusual request. I think Wicket should either support intercepting pages with PageParameters or have some kind of extension point so that I can implement this myself in my own app. S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
