+1 and this can get on the list for 1.3 as well IMO, or will this become a big api change?
Martijn On 8/18/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is there any reason why urlfor calls are not synchronized between > requestcycle and component? i know component had some urlfor that were > conviniences and basically passed in "this" for some params - but what about > requestcycle.urlfor(page) - should that not also be in component? > > i think it was a mistake to start with to pollute component with urlfor - > its too late to do anything now but maybe in 2.0 we can get rid of them? > there is nothing wrong with getRequestCycle().urlFor() syntax imho > > -Igor > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > > > -- Download Wicket 1.2.1 now! Embed Wicket components in your portals! -- http://wicketframework.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
