[X] Yes, let's go Apache

Jan


Eelco Hillenius wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>Some time ago we announced that we started negotiations with Apache to
>start an incubation process. That basically means we would be entering
>a 'test period' where we proof ourselves to fit in as an Apache
>process, adhering Apache's rules for creating distributions, voting,
>etc. The proposal is written up here:
>http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WicketProposal
>
>The time is now to vote whether we should get on with this. Wicket's
>committers are the only ones having binding votes. But if you want to
>air support or concerns, please do. If this proposal passes, the next
>step is that the proposal will be voted on over at Apache.
>
>[  ] Yes, let's go Apache
>[  ] No, let's not do that and look for other alternatives
>
>Eelco
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>_______________________________________________
>Wicket-develop mailing list
>Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>
>  
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to