On 9/22/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just talked to eelco, so we want full stack for case(a) just as if it was a > component? pretty crazy, that we can handle just like wicket:message works > now - add an empty webmarkup container and let the icomponenttaghandler > handle it just like it would a regular component.
So why didn't we say 'just create an empty webmarkup container' when we had the discussion about <wicket:message> tags? Because the whole point is here that you can do i18n directly in your markup without having to have it in sync with your component tree. Same here. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
