On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 12:45:53 -0800, Jonathan Locke wrote:
>i was initially in agreement with your idea to make autolink work
>exactly as before but automatically. i still tend to think this, but
>i'm trying to understand problems people are having with that since they
>may be right.
Fine, so lets resummarize. The list of concerns I recall are:
- What happens if home.html exists both under "/" and
"/WEB-INF/classes"? What is the expected/intuitive behavior? Can we /
should we allow users to override this?
- Eelco didn't like the idea of implicitly mapping resources on behalf
on the user, he prefers explicitly forcing such behavior.
- Juergen wanted to be able to override the search path so he can drop
in a component JAR, then override the HTML it links to without actually
going inside and modifying it.
- Juergen was concerned whether this mapping only works for HTML pages
or for any other kinds of resources and how do we plan on handling
images, etc?
Feel free to add other ones I might have missed.
Personally I think we should really focus on automating the
existing functionality of autolink before we try to cram new features
into it.
Gili
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
