There's now a new project "wicket-contrib-benchmark". I'll probably
add a JSF implementation at some point.

-Phil

On 7/11/05, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for the advice. I've not much experience profiling with java,
> I didn't know that the time invoking counting is counted in the result.
> That doesn't seem very smart to me either.
> 
> Johan Compagner wrote:
> > all high accurate settings i know of (also yourkit) are influencing the
> > test itself!
> > You shouldn't use method tracing/invoke counting with yourkit either..
> > (only if you really need invoke counting)
> > Because the time it takes to record those things are also in the trace
> > itself (pretty stupid)
> >
> > method sampling of yourkit is pretty much close to what you feel in the
> > real world.
> >
> > johan
> >
> >
> > Matej Knopp wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm.. Using YourKit Java Profiler, wicket really is only marginaly
> >> slower. I wonder why JProfiler makes such a difference (on the highest
> >> accurate settings).
> >>
> >> Matej Knopp wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thank you.
> >>> The results I get are mixed. When editing acustomer entry and saving
> >>> it, the performance is comparable.
> >>> But deleting the customer, wicket is still almost twice as slow than
> >>> tapestry.
> >>> Have you tried to do nothing but deleting like 10 customers? I'm
> >>> under an impression that rendering listview with many items like this
> >>> is the slowest part.
> >>>
> >>> Chris Turner wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I actually didn't really polish my setup. I just grabbed some stuff
> >>>> I did on a previous project which made use of the Spring Framework
> >>>> support for log4j configuration. Basically:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) Copy spring framework jar to your webapp WEB-INF/lib directory
> >>>>
> >>>> 2) Add the following to your web.xml:
> >>>>    <context-param>
> >>>>        <param-name>log4jConfigLocation</param-name>
> >>>>        <param-value>/WEB-INF/log4j.xml</param-value>
> >>>>    </context-param>
> >>>>
> >>>> <servlet>
> >>>>        <servlet-name>log4jConfig</servlet-name>
> >>>>
> >>>> <servlet-class>org.springframework.web.util.Log4jConfigServlet</servlet-class>
> >>>>
> >>>>        <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
> >>>>    </servlet>
> >>>>
> >>>> 3) Create a log4j.xml file:
> >>>>
> >>>> <log4j:configuration xmlns:log4j="http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/";
> >>>> debug="false">
> >>>>
> >>>>    <appender name="CONSOLE" class="org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender">
> >>>>        <param name="Target" value="System.out"/>
> >>>>        <param name="Threshold" value="INFO"/>
> >>>>
> >>>>        <layout class="org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout">
> >>>>            <!-- The default pattern: Date Priority [Category]
> >>>> Message\n -->
> >>>>            <param name="ConversionPattern" value="%d{ABSOLUTE} %-5p
> >>>> [%c{1}] %m%n"/>
> >>>>        </layout>
> >>>>    </appender>
> >>>>
> >>>>    <category name="">
> >>>>        <priority value="INFO"/>
> >>>>    </category>
> >>>>
> >>>>    <root>
> >>>>        <appender-ref ref="CONSOLE"/>
> >>>>    </root>
> >>>>
> >>>> </log4j:configuration>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Matej Knopp wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Could you please post somewhere the war file with logging disabled?
> >>>>> I tried adding log4j.properties with the following content
> >>>>>
> >>>>> log4j.threshold=info
> >>>>> log4j.debug=false
> >>>>>
> >>>>> into the wicket-benchmark class path but it helped only a little.
> >>>>> It seems that I'm doing something wrong.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Chris Turner wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I believe that all of the logging statements are currently
> >>>>>> surrounded by the if check - I could not find any that were not.
> >>>>>> However, if you don't provide a logging configuration then the
> >>>>>> call to log.isDebugEnabled() always returns TRUE. In my opinion
> >>>>>> this has always been a fault of commons logging/log4j. In my
> >>>>>> opinion if you don't configure debug logging to be explicitly on
> >>>>>> then it should ALWAYS be FALSE.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The problem as I see it is that we will always end up with
> >>>>>> problems like this where someone evaluating wicket just knocks up
> >>>>>> a test application, does a quick performance comparison with their
> >>>>>> existing framework, finds our performance very poor (because debug
> >>>>>> is on by default) and throws wicket away without investigating
> >>>>>> further.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Therefore we must either find a way to ensure that people cannot
> >>>>>> easily build a wicket application with debug logging left on by
> >>>>>> default, or if we can't do this then we must minimise the
> >>>>>> performance impact of them forgetting to turn it off!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>> Chris
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Johan Compagner wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If you are in loggin debug mode then
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> log.debug("Begin render " + this);
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> is fine by me
> >>>>>>> BUT
> >>>>>>> it should always be checked first:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> if(log.isDebugEnabled())
> >>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>    log.debug("Begin render " + this);
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Chris Turner wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Confirmed. Turn off the logging (initialise log4j and set level
> >>>>>>>> for wicket to INFO or greater)  and Wicket is only about 4%
> >>>>>>>> slower than the Tapestry application. I suspect with a little
> >>>>>>>> effort we could soon tune out this small amount  :)    Probably
> >>>>>>>> best to wait until the 1.1 code base is complete to do this as
> >>>>>>>> refactorings are notorious for undoing previous performance
> >>>>>>>> optimizations.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> However, the question is therefore what to do with logging: One
> >>>>>>>> option is to ship Wicket example applications with correctly
> >>>>>>>> configured log4j to turn logging off by default. This would also
> >>>>>>>> require VERY clear documentation to explain that Wicket logging
> >>>>>>>> should be turned off by default due to the application
> >>>>>>>> performance hit of having it switched on. Alternatively, we
> >>>>>>>> should just go through the code and remove all of the debug
> >>>>>>>> render or at least refactor the statements of the form:
> >>>>>>>> log.debug("Begin render " + this); which are very expensive
> >>>>>>>> because they do a toString() on the object.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Any other thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>>>> Chris
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Johan Compagner wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> if that really is the case then we should turn logging default
> >>>>>>>>> off??
> >>>>>>>>> and supply a right properties file?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> johan
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Chris Turner wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> One word:    ***  LOGGING ***
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Looking through the profile in detail it appears that the
> >>>>>>>>>> benchmark application has no logging configured so by default
> >>>>>>>>>> logging is ON. Many of the preformance bottlenecks seem to be
> >>>>>>>>>> in building the strings for logging. I'm going to figure out
> >>>>>>>>>> how to turn off logging and then I'll try the profiling again.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>>>>>> Chris
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Chris Turner wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I have just run the two examples through a profiler (YourKit
> >>>>>>>>>>> Java Profiler) and I can confirm that the Tapestry example is
> >>>>>>>>>>> just over twice as fast as the Wicket one. The amount of
> >>>>>>>>>>> difference is variable, with the biggest difference being for
> >>>>>>>>>>> the page that renders the list view.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Taking a quick look through the profile trace for the Wicker
> >>>>>>>>>>> code there does not seem to be any one area where there is a
> >>>>>>>>>>> particular performance bottleneck. However, most of the
> >>>>>>>>>>> largest areas of execution time resolve down to one of two
> >>>>>>>>>>> cases:
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Methods that do lots of string manipulation (in particular
> >>>>>>>>>>> toString and StringBuffer.append stuff)
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Methods that invoke Ognl
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Expanded report showing main bottlenecks as identified by
> >>>>>>>>>>> YourKit: http://www.skipoles.co.uk/wicket-benchmark.zip
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I'll investigate a bit further.....
> >>>>>>>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Chris
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's a scarry difference. We should take a good look at
> >>>>>>>>>>>> that and see what causes it. Personally, I wouldn't expect
> >>>>>>>>>>>> our 'statefullness' to be the real problem here; as 'heavy'
> >>>>>>>>>>>> as it sounds to create new objects, this is something Java
> >>>>>>>>>>>> should be very good at. We should use a profiler to find out.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Eelco
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Phil Kulak wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I just did some quick testing using the two wars. I did 100
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> page loads
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> with a brand new session on each load and Tapestry was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> about twice as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> fast for the list view page and the much smaller edit page.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> what would happen if I made the Tapestry app stateful as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> well. That
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> may be a more fair comparison.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/10/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arg, okay, that was to much to post. Here's the origonal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> message:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here are the two wars. Let me know if I should change the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> functionality at all. Also, notice that I didn't try very
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hard to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> optimize the wicket application. For example, I don't use
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> optimizeItemRemoval = true and then manually removeAll()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on deletes. I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could have done that, but there are probably corrosponding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> optimizations for Tapestry that I just don't know about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> because I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't use it. Also, the Tapestry app is totally stateless,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> give it an edge, but I dunno for sure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/10/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, I just realized that it was a bit dumb to post 5
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> megs of files
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to mailing list. Sorry about that. Here are some URLs:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~pkulak/tapestry-benchmark.war
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~pkulak/wicket-benchmark.war
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/10/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here are the two wars. Let me know if I should change the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functionality at all. Also, notice that I didn't try
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very hard to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optimize the wicket application. For example, I don't use
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optimizeItemRemoval = true and then manually removeAll()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on deletes. I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could have done that, but there are probably corrosponding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optimizations for Tapestry that I just don't know about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't use it. Also, the Tapestry app is totally
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stateless, so that may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give it an edge, but I dunno for sure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Phil
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/10/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there's just one DAO, then I can store the data in a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Map and not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worry about HSQL or anything like that. Actually, I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just wrote it in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket (it's absolutly frickin' amazing how FEW lines
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it took) and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll get it cloned in Tapestry tomorrow and post up
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both wars.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basicaly, it's just a bare-bones version of your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CD-App. I didn't want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make it too complicated because I'm not super
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> efficiant with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tapestry and I didn't want that part to take all day.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Phil
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/10/05, Eelco Hillenius
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Phil Kulak wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless the dynamic images are actually created on the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fly, Wicket's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gonna get slaughtered there since Tapestry will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually copy static
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> images from the jar into a public webserver directory.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think Wicket handles the static images pretty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> efficiently. It would be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting to see if there is any performance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> difference with Tapestry,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I think not. So Tapestry actually copies the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to the webapp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory? A potential problem with that is that you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't be sure that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have write rights in your webapp dir. You can't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even be sure if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a filesystem dir at all (might still be a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .war, or potentially
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some other schema).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe a list view of 50 items with edit and delete
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> options? I could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make a single, thread-safe DAO, and then if you could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find a way to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hit the page a bunch of times with concurrent edits
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and deletes, it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be a nice muli-user test.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should you have just one DAO? Why not an instance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per request or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> session?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my idea, but I have no idea how you plan to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test it, so
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something else may be more appropriate.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it would be nice to have a special performance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test page. Where
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should we put it though?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eelco
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/9/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If i get 2 wars of an app that does some big
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendering (like listviews,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dynamic images and that kind of thing)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So i don't think hangman will do it really it is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit to small.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't know if we really have to test a database.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That i don't like. It
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be plain pojo's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that are in mem created for a list/detail/edit view.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What kind of functionality would be a good test?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> johan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Phil Kulak wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this offer still available? Don't we already have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a working Hangman
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> app in both frameworks? If that won't cut it, I'd be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> glad to write a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tapestry clone of a Wicket app. It would give me a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chance to get
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better acquainted with Tapestry 4.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/18/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then we need 2 the same apps with the same feature
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set in both frameworks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If somebody is willing to build that and supply me
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the 2 wars then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i will do a performance test
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with yourekit..
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> johan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 叶卫国 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody compare it with tapestry?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Migration Strategies
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> straightforward articles,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to get up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speed, fast.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Migration Strategies
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>               from IBM. Find simple to follow
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to get up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speed, fast.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&opclick
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> N琀S^甸殜X�'矈辵辑呧�Z+a妤伶鉂j歗�)�&閞讍⿵
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?跽﹦
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5瀶{獾歙黑茩hazV瓃薭澺殨�+y┹v妤偠﹩',电!瀴h�&瑍
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 窞 、 贽 介韱�-y烛�
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ┹5R
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 璀�"沧+"�m��鹈ir壙倧莨﹑y抚j耽rG谦櫒x%娝V壣
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 峨 甔 � (悍~娻zw瓎踚��鍔薼矉玵玷�咤娝l⺋)撸
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> �"rG谦
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> N�HS^�隊X���'���u�����2��Z+a���❪�j�^�)�&�r׆��
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?�թ�
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5��{�쨺�ƙh��azV�z�b�ۚ��+y��v楂���',��!��h�&��
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> �~���w���޽� 톋-y���
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ��5R
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ��"�׫�+"�m����ir����ݹ�py��j��rG��ǫ����x%��V�����X���(��~��zw���i����l���q���z���l�X��)ߣ�"rG��ǫ
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dual!' webinar happening
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the latest in dual
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core and dual graphics technology at this free one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hour event hosted by HP,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> N�HS^�隊X���'���u�����2��Z+a���❪�j�^�)�&�r׆��
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ?�թ�
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 5��{�쨺�ƙh��azV�z�b�ۚ��+y��v楂���',��!��h�&��
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> �~���w���޽� 톋-y���
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ��5R
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ��"�׫�+"�m����ir����ݹ�py��j��rG��ǫ����x%��V�����X���(��~��zw���i����l���q���z���l�X��)ߣ�"rG��ǫ
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!'
> >>>>>>>>>>>> webinar happening
> >>>>>>>>>>>> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> latest in dual
> >>>>>>>>>>>> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour
> >>>>>>>>>>>> event hosted by HP,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!'
> >>>>>>>>>>> webinar happening
> >>>>>>>>>>> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the
> >>>>>>>>>>> latest in dual
> >>>>>>>>>>> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event
> >>>>>>>>>>> hosted by HP,
> >>>>>>>>>>> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!'
> >>>>>>>>>> webinar happening
> >>>>>>>>>> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the
> >>>>>>>>>> latest in dual
> >>>>>>>>>> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event
> >>>>>>>>>> hosted by HP,
> >>>>>>>>>> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit
> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!'
> >>>>>>>>> webinar happening
> >>>>>>>>> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the
> >>>>>>>>> latest in dual
> >>>>>>>>> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event
> >>>>>>>>> hosted by HP,
> >>>>>>>>> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit
> >>>>>>>>> http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!'
> >>>>>>>> webinar happening
> >>>>>>>> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest
> >>>>>>>> in dual
> >>>>>>>> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event
> >>>>>>>> hosted by HP,
> >>>>>>>> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit
> >>>>>>>> http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!'
> >>>>>>> webinar happening
> >>>>>>> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest
> >>>>>>> in dual
> >>>>>>> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event
> >>>>>>> hosted by HP,
> >>>>>>> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar
> >>>>>> happening
> >>>>>> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest
> >>>>>> in dual
> >>>>>> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event
> >>>>>> hosted by HP,
> >>>>>> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar
> >>>>> happening
> >>>>> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in
> >>>>> dual
> >>>>> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event
> >>>>> hosted by HP,
> >>>>> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar
> >>>> happening
> >>>> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in
> >>>> dual
> >>>> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted
> >>>> by HP,
> >>>> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar
> >>> happening
> >>> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
> >>> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted
> >>> by HP,
> >>> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Wicket-user mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar
> >> happening
> >> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
> >> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted
> >> by HP,
> >> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wicket-user mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar
> > happening
> > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
> > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
> > AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
> AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

Reply via email to