Let's not get carried away here, it's allways ok for anyone to argue on
design decisions and stuff :) Discussions like these (e.g. last month's
'interface with an I' discussion) tend to turn religious which can make
them harsh. But, by discussing it we're re-thinking it - allways a good
thing, keeps us sharp - and we're building up a mail archive for new
people that have the same questions.
Peace!
Eelco
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I have to /strongly/ disagree here. There are several points I want to
get across. And I hope that this discussion will soon stop, as we need
to work on adding core functionality, instead of aimlessly discussing
the merits of Interfaces. It has already taken too much of my time,
mainly because of the tone of the discussion implying that the Wicket
team is incompetent. I /really/ don't like that tone.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
