Can I make a request that the ctors for RequiredValidator, IntegerValidator and LengthValidator be changed from private to protected to support this?
Maybe EmailAddressPatternValidator should go the other way and be changed from public to protected and be made singleton to be consistent, even though his would break some code. --- Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Turner wrote: > > However, I think we also need to keep supporting > the ability to create > > stateful validators. > > > Sure, I think that would be no problem. It is a > user's responsibility > now though. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
