no specific problems per se. i just think i see a way to simplify the API
and add a lot of neat default behavior. if my experiment doesn't appeal
to the group at large, we can stick with what we've got.
jon
----
Could I ask exactly what the problems were?
On 7/21/05, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> i'm building a full-on webapp in wicket finally.
>>
>> ran into some issues with the contrib-data* packages and decided to
start
>> over. so i've been working all day today on a framework for database
>> persistence for wicket... it's really easy and really simple (so far,
>> anyway)
>>
>> jon
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
