Having 2 versions, one for < 1.5 and one for >= 1.5, is I guess out
of the question as well? (like commons-collections)
It would be great to at least javadoc stuff as if it were developed
for 1.5.
Erik.
> As a framework we can't do that yet i am afraid.
> i think even 1.2 will be to soon. As wicket is a server tech and that
> is the one place that doesn't upgrade easy.
>
> johan
>
>
> Phil Kulak wrote:
>> I would love to see IModel defined as IModel<T>, personally. But I
>> don't know how that would shake out for < 1.5 people.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
