> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 4:28 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket + Acegi Security ?
> 
> Now, I don't want to downplay the advantages a product like 
> SiteMinder or Acegi has, but I'd like to express that it 
> sucks that those products impose a url model on you. It makes 
> it harder for you to decide later on to restructure your site 
> as well; in the end for non-document oriented 
> webapplications, imo URLs should be part of your application 
> internals really.
>

Does Acegi impose a URL model on the application?
 
> I think the way to go is to have a proper JAAS implementation 
> that is independent of URLs. I think Acegi can do such stuff 
> too, so I think that would be a good path to investigate.
> 

Yup.  Questions lurk in my mind too regarding whether to attempt Acegi
or JAAS in Wicket.

> 
> Gert Jan Verhoog wrote:
> 
> > Hi list,
> >
> > Just wondering if anybody has successfully used the Acegi security 
> > framework with Wicket (Phil?). I'm currently using Acegi with 
> > SpringMVC and I'd like to use it with Spring/Wicket.
> >

This is something that's on my TODO list as well, Gert.  Thanks for
bringing it up on the list.



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to